Blessings in well-being, Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 9:22 AM Subject: VIERA SCHEIBNER ON TETANUS & POLIO >Sebastiana wrote: >>From URL: http://www.whale.to/Vaccines/tetanus_and_polio.html > >TETANUS AND POLIO VACCINES -SOME FACTS FOR PARENTS WHO ARE WORRIED ABOUT >THESE DISEASES by Viera Scheibner (Jan 1998) > >Mrs J Woods letter in the Summer 1997 edition of The Informed Parent >inspired me to write this letter to the Editor of TIP. J Wood stopped >any further vaccinations when she realised that her fully vaccinated >child developed a most frightening episode of whooping cough and >suffered chronic ill health for years because of all those vaccines >injected into his system. > >Interestingly, the specialist confirmed to her that the childžs immune >system was not very strong, but the GP called her irresponsible when >she decided not to continue with any further vaccine injections (I would >not worry very much about a GP's advise since GP's in the UK labour >under a major monetary conflict of interest in vaccinating). She stood >her ground, however, but is still worried about diseases like tetanus >and polio. > >1. Tetanus is a very rare disease in developed countries: there are only >about 12 cases of tetanus per year in Australia, and half of those who >got it were vaccinated. Perhaps the most interesting thing about tetanus >is that those who get it do not develop immunity to it. How does one get >tetanus? Well, from deep puncture wounds. > >In other words the pathogen (Clostridium tetani) is literally injected >into the body via the deep puncture wounds. Vaccine injection does the >same thing: it bypasses the normal portals of entry (the mouth and nose) >and delivers the pathogen and toxins straight into the blood stream >which triggers an unnatural, abnormal, deranged immune response called >sensitisation. > >Far from immunising, tetanus (and other) vaccine injections make the >recipients more susceptible to diseases. J. Wood clearly saw it in her >child: chronic ill health, recurrent coughs and colds for years. It is >very likely, that the obvious improvements of her child's health was >achieved by him finally developing whooping cough in its acute form. >--any parents report either a marked improvement or disappearance of >'asthma after their vaccinated children developed acute whooping cough. >Medical research demonstrated >that having whooping cough prevents asthma. One must wonder how much of >that 'asthma' is >just a chronic whooping cough as a result of the vaccinated child's >immune system being >deranged by vaccination and not being able to mount a proper, acute, >immune response. > >If this does not make sense, then perhaps something else will: the New >England Journal of Medicine published in 1984 that tetanus booster >injections result in the same derangement of T4 and T8 cells as seen in >AIDS patients. A 'mysterious' new syndrome emerged in the US: thousands >of children are developing AIDS symptoms (with deranged T4 and T8 cells) >without being HIV positive My well-considered opinion is that it comes >from that T (standing for tetanus) in the DPT vaccine. > >2. Polio has been painted as some natural scourge of humanity. Yet, >epidemics and outbreaks of polio in Europe go back to only less than 100 >years. The 1949-50 and later outbreaks of polio were demonstrably >caused by intensified diphtheria and whooping cough vaccination, >tonsillectomies, other injections (painkillers) and a variety of >traumas. They invented a name for it: provocation poliomyelitis. Even >though this has not been discussed in literature, the earliest outbreaks >were no doubt triggered by intensified smallpox vaccination. The >evidence for this connection comes from Egyptian excavations: some >mummies had withered limbs; but of course, variolation (a crude form of >smallpox inoculation) has been practised thousands of years ago, and >most particularly, in Egypt. > >When the first, injectable, polio vaccine was tested on 1.8 million >American children, within a few days they had a huge epidemic of >paralytic polio: in the vaccinated, their parents and other contacts. >They called it the Cutter incident and claimed that some of the vaccines >(produced by the Cutter Laboratories) contained live polio virus. So, >the company withdrew their vaccines despite polio vaccines produced by >other manufacturers also causing paralysis in this outbreak. > >The OP vaccines are officially causing paralysis, allegedly only 10-12 >reported cases per year in the USA. The word 'reported' is the key word >here. With the mass use of the polio vaccines and continuing occurence >of polio in the vaccinated, the necessity arose to redefine the disease >polio. The classical definition of polio is a disease with residual >paralysis which resolves within 2 months (usually within days). The new >definition of polio now is 'a disease with residual paralysis persisting >for more than 60 days.' This is the secret formula of 'eradication' of >polio. Children are still getting polio, but those cases which resolve >within 60 days (which represent some 90% of cases) are not diagnosed as >polio. A new disease emerged: viral meningitis and as the incidence of >polio plummeted, so did the incidence of viral meningitis sky rocketed. > >The best (and perhaps most frightening) example of these "elegant >administrative moves" is how they allegedly eliminated polio in the >Americas (meaning South America). The Journal of Infectious Diseases >published in 1991 the results of a major vaccination drive between 1985 >and 1989 to eliminate polio. Within 4 months they had a huge outbreak of >paralytic polio (350 cases). They decided to reformulate the vaccine. >Now if this outbreak had occurred in the unvaccinated they would not >have had to reformulate the vaccine. The outbreak occured in the >vaccinated. > >However, the outbreaks with ever increasing number of reported cases of >'flaccid paralysis' in the vaccinated continued. So what did they do? >They started discarding most of the reported cases of flaccid paralysis. >Out of 2094 reported cases they only 'confirmed' 130, the rest (1964) >were discarded. They published a graph which shows ever increasing >number of reported cases as shadowy columns in the background and the >ever decreasing numbers of confirmed cases as black columns in the >forefront. I praise them for publishing it this way: any discerning and >unbrainwashed reader can see very clearly what happened in the Americas >between 1985 - 1989: mass vaccination caused sustained outbreaks of >paralytic polio and they tried to camouflage it by discarding the vast >majority of cases. When they finally stopped the program in 1989, even >the number of reported cases (shown as those shadowy columns in the >background) went down. > >The same happened in other countries: huge epidemics of paralysis >followed mass-vaccination drives. How many vaccines does the child need >to be protected? Children are given ever increasing numbers of >'boosters'. Why? This trend makes sense only when you consider that all >those outbreaks and epidemics of any 'vaccine preventable' diseases >occur in the vaccinated. The vaccines are ineffective. A shortage of >space does not allow me to elaborate more on this interesting subject' > >There is only one immunity: the natural immunity which is achieved by >children going >through infectious diseases of childhood. They are here to prime and >mature the immune system of children and they represent developmental >milestones. Perhaps more on this subject in some of the next issues of >TIP. Some problems with infectious diseases are results of >mismanagement: if a child with severe measles is given antibiotics >instead of vitamin A and C and its fever is suppressed you are asking >for trouble. > >And last but not least: no matter how worried anybody is about diseases, >one should remember one important thing, namely that vaccines do not >prevent diseases, they make you sick. > >*************************************************************** >Karin Schumacher >Vaccine Information & Awareness (VIA) >12799 La Tortola >San Diego, CA 92129 >619-484-3197 (phone/voicemail) >619-484-1187 (fax) >via@access1.net (email) >http://www.909shot.com (NVIC website) >http://www.access1.net/via (VIA website) >*************************************************************** >We Must Have The Freedom To Choose & Respect Everyone's Choice >*************************************************************** >Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical >OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you >implement that decision is yours and yours alone.